Archive for the ‘Security Theater’ Category

290 killed by Taser - 25 were armed, none had firearms

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

More Taser death.

In the United States, more than 290 people have died since June 2001 after being struck by police Tasers, according to the human rights group Amnesty International. It said in October that only 25 of the 290 were armed, and none had firearms.

One wonders why cops need to use a Taser to bring down a suspect, when most of them didn’t even have weapons. Especially if you consider the usual Taser usage scene: 4 cops against 1 dude -> Obviously, it’s Taser time.

Once again to all ye police officers out there: The Taser should not be used just because you are in a bad mood, or too tired, or just not too good at your job (i.e. protecting innocent people).

Link

Technorati Tags:

Please return immediately

Saturday, January 12th, 2008

I heard a funny announcement on the PA at London Heathrow.

Passenger [...], please return immediately to the Central Search and Security area!

I feel safer already.

In this case the passenger’s name was Abdul. I wonder if his middle-eastern name was causing him trouble again? Or was he himself the troublemaker? Or is it all just a big conspiracy misunderstanding…

Amusing nonetheless.

Security garbage

Sunday, December 30th, 2007

This article about the security measures that we have to go through before boarding an aircraft caught my eye.

The heart of the article focuses on how we, humans, continue letting ourselves be subjugated by the government with ineffective and often humiliating security measures, yet protests to this new opression are few and far between. Our newfound right to freely travel far and wide is being put to the test, and the outlook is bleak.

In questioning the effectivity of today’s airport security, the article talks about how airport staff (who are generally contracted from outside companies) rarely undergo screening and have virtually unlimited access to aircraft (where they can plant nail clippers, toothpaste and shoes). Pilots and crew (who are subject to background checks and training) on the other hand, have to suffer the same humiliation as the passengers. It is hard to find the logic.

There is more, of course, so go read it. I especially enjoyed this paragraph:

consider for a moment the hypocrisy of T.S.A.’s confiscation policy. At every concourse checkpoint you’ll see a bin or barrel brimming with contraband containers taken from passengers for having exceeded the [liquid] volume limit. Now, the assumption has to be that the materials in those containers are potentially hazardous. If not, why were they seized in the first place? But if so, why are they dumped unceremoniously into the trash? They are not quarantined or handed over to the bomb squad; they are simply thrown away. The agency seems to be saying that it knows these things are harmless. But it’s going to steal them anyway, and either you accept it or you don’t fly.

Although the focus is on the TSA which is a US agency, the same can be said for most of the world’s airports. Mostly because their policy is dictacted by the fact that everyone wants to fly to the USA, and for that, they have to follow the USA’s rules.

Read it, and weep.

Ten fingers

Thursday, December 27th, 2007

2008 is the year of ten fingers. Soon you will have to leave all your ten fingerprints at the US immigration, not just your two index fingers (not thumb as the article states).

Not only that, but the data is now stored by the FBI, and used in criminal investigations, not just for immigration purposes. So by going to the states, your fingerprints automatically mingle with those of murderers and thieves.

I think the worst part is that people don’t seem to be complaining or taking this seriously. I fear the future. And here I thought I could have a nice, relaxing day, instead the world is going to hell. I should stop reading the paper.

Link

Lethal weapons are a good thing

Tuesday, November 20th, 2007

Police around the world are careless with their use of non-lethal weapons. It seems that rather then attempting to subdue a suspect they seem to simply taser them and then have to subdue a thrashing panicking person instead.Is it laziness or cruelty?

In this clip you can clearly see that the dude was not threatening the police in any way, aside from throwing furniture. I guess that an old chair and crappy dell is worth more then a dude’s life these days. In this article, the man in question was in a diabetic coma. That’s even more wrong on so many levels.

Some might say that in this day and age, being able to restrain potential suicide bombers quickly is a good thing. However, if you taser someone with their finger on a big red detonator button, you can be damn sure that the button is going to be pushed.

Perhaps the police should ease up on the doughnuts and go back to the gym and dojo.

Article1 Article2 Youtube1 Youtube2

You are being watched

Tuesday, June 12th, 2007

This story on boing boing points to an editorial at Forbes about modern cities. Worth a read!

I especially liked Cory’s Snitchtown. I have serious issues with surveillance these days, and Snitchtown mirrors my thoughts 100%.

Stockholm’s subway stations are lined with cameras. I counted around 20 cameras at my station. I wonder what they do with all that footage? Wouldn’t it have been wiser to invest that money in a few more security guards to patrol the subway at night?

I personally don’t feel any safer with these cameras. And the subway is still a shithole on Friday and Saturday evening when the drunk masses come out to play.

Link

Technorati Tags: